Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

Pappas v. Pilevsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 19, 1996

225 A.D.2d 394; 640 N.Y.2d 747; 640 N.Y.S.2d 747; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2730

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

JD2 Realty Mgt. LLC v. Evojets LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
Lemle v. Lemle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In this action for an accounting, defendants moved to dismiss just prior to commencement of the disclosure that was intended to clarify the nature of the defendant business entities, and the interaction and relationship among those entities and the individual parties. As it appeared that facts essential to justify opposition to defendants’ motion may exist but could not then be stated, the IAS Court properly denied the motion with leave to renew after completion of appropriate disclosure (CPLR 3211 [d]; 3212 [f]; Terranova v Emil, 20 NY2d 493, 497; Simpson v Term Indus., 126 AD2d 484, 486). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.