Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

Haywoode v. Lee

Haywoode v. Lee
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 19, 1996
225 A.D.2d 420; 640 N.Y.2d 484; 640 N.Y.S.2d 484; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2711
Haywoode v. Lee

Opinion of the Court

The hearing court properly allocated the attorneys’ fees, especially in light of the outgoing attorney’s cavalier attitude with regard to the need for obtaining evidence and medical documentation and his demonstrated inability to produce necessary litigation documents from his file when called upon. While the incoming attorneys cannot be said to have performed yeoman’s work, by merely settling the action without having to serve any pleadings or conduct any discovery- at all, their efforts were more productive than the sudden flurry of activity conducted by the outgoing attorney when he learned of the imminent substitution. We have considered the parties’ other contentions for affirmative relief and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.