Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

People v. Martinez

People v. Martinez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 26, 1996
225 A.D.2d 467; 639 N.Y.2d 924; 639 N.Y.S.2d 924; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3185
People v. Martinez

Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s Rosario claim is unpreserved for review and we decline to review it in the interest of justice (People v Jackson, 78 NY2d 900). Were we to review it, we would find the contention to be without merit. The record before this Court indicates that prior to and during the trial, defendant possessed the original handwritten receipt which had been prepared on a voucher form, and failed to raise any claim arising from the People’s purported failure to provide defense counsel with the document (see, People v Tamayo, 222 AD2d 321). The record before us supports the People’s contention that defendant was provided with the original of this document, of which there *468was no copy. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.