Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

People v. Morillo

People v. Morillo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 26, 1996
225 A.D.2d 479; 639 N.Y.2d 921; 639 N.Y.S.2d 921; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3093
People v. Morillo

Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s contention that the police improperly used his mother and sister "as their agents to coax [him] into speaking” is without merit, since the record indicates that defendant’s spontaneous incriminating statement was the result of a voluntary change of mind (People v Kinnard, 62 NY2d 910), not police action involving the use of his relatives. While the detective had commented to the relatives that defendant "should try to help himself in cooperating”, there is no indication that defendant’s relatives conveyed the detective’s suggestion to defendant. We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. *480Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.