Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

People v. Purtell

People v. Purtell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 496; 639 N.Y.2d 814; 639 N.Y.S.2d 814; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3289
People v. Purtell

Opinion of the Court

While a defendant must be sentenced "without unreasonable delay” (CPL 380.30 [1]), delay caused by a defendant’s conduct is excusable (People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359, 366). Defendant first absconded in 1989, after pleading guilty to grand larceny. Thereafter, he was arrested and convicted of various crimes in several different States, and he repeatedly jumped bail that was set on New York fugitive warrants, after using aliases and false pedigrees. Although the 41/2 year period of delay in imposing sentence is considerable, it was entirely attributable to defendant’s conduct, and accordingly, the delay was not unreasonable. Defendant’s sentence was not excessive in light of his extensive criminal record. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.