Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

Laitmon v. Divittorio

Laitmon v. Divittorio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 523; 638 N.Y.2d 777; 638 N.Y.S.2d 777; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1921
Laitmon v. Divittorio

Opinion of the Court

*524The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The court properly dismissed the first, third, and fourth causes of action inasmuch as there were material terms of the contract left open for future agreement (see, Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher, 52 NY2d 105). The second cause of action, however, was properly pleaded and, accordingly, we reinstate it.

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.