Laitmon v. Divittorio
Opinion of the Court
The court properly dismissed the first, third, and fourth causes of action inasmuch as there were material terms of the contract left open for future agreement (see, Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher, 52 NY2d 105). The second cause of action, however, was properly pleaded and, accordingly, we reinstate it.
The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.