Smith v. Board of Education
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, West-
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs made a prima facie showing that the defendants violated Labor Law § 240 (1), and that such violation was a contributing cause of the injured plaintiff’s injuries (see, Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513). In op position to the motion, the defendants only submitted an affirmation of counsel which alleged in a conclusory fashion that issues of fact existed as to how the accident occurred and whether the defendants’ violation was a proximate cause of the injuries. This is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Figueroa v Manhattanville Coll., 193 AD2d 778; Walsh v Baker, 172 AD2d 1038). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.