In re Ceasar O.
Opinion of the Court
Order of disposi
Viewed in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see, Matter of Michael D., 109 AD2d 633, 634, affd 66 NY2d 843), the complainant’s testimony that appellant took a bag of food from him while he was being attacked by others in the group of five or six that followed him into a building and fled together was legally sufficient to establish appellant’s in-concert liability for robbery in the second and third degrees (see, People v Cradle, 176 AD2d 212, 213, lv denied 79 NY2d 826). Circumstances that might have hindered the complainant’s ability to observe appellant during the robbery raised issues of credibility that were placed before Family Court, and we. see no reason to disturb its determination (see, Matter of Jason V., 171 AD2d 447). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.