Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

Pacific Employer's Insurance v. United Talmudical Academy

Pacific Employer's Insurance v. United Talmudical Academy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 21, 1996
227 A.D.2d 304; 642 N.Y.S.2d 319
Pacific Employer's Insurance v. United Talmudical Academy

Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered June 9, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that plaintiff is obligated to defend and indemnify defendant-respondent in a certain pending action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*305The record supports the trial court’s finding that defendant, a religious institution that operates 13 schools in the region, had a practice, condoned by plaintiff, based on the frequency of injury-causing incidents in its schools, that it need not report an incident of this type until a summons was served, thus excusing the 16-month delay between the incident and the notice defendant gave plaintiff promptly after it was sued (see, Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 19; White v City of New York, 81 NY2d 955, 957). Concur — Sullivan J. P., Milonas, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.