Holman v. Ferdinand
Holman v. Ferdinand
228 A.D.2d 441; 643 N.Y.2d 409; 643 N.Y.S.2d 409; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6242
Opinion of the Court
A proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 does not lie to review an order denying the branch of a defendant’s omnibus motion which is to suppress identification testimony (see, CPL 460.10 [1] [a]; Matter of Bull v Owens, 191 AD2d 692, 693; Matter of Hennessy v Gorman, 58 NY2d 806, 807). Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.