People v. McLean
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence is not legally sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Barrett, 166 AD2d 657, 658; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.