Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

B & H Associates v. Buscemi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 15, 1996

229 A.D.2d 456; 645 N.Y.S.2d 538; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7766

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Sutton & Edwards, Inc. v. 68-60 Austin Street Realty Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
R.R. Ragette, Inc. v. D'Incecco (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
Syragakis v. Majestic Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
Moore & Moore Real Estate v. Aloi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated May 25, 1995, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs

"It is well established that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a real estate broker will be deemed to have earned his commission when he produces a purchaser who is *457ready, willing and able to purchase at the seller’s terms” (Henri-Lynn Realty v Huang, 159 AD2d 486; see, Rusciano Realty Servs. v Griffler, 62 NY2d 696). The plaintiffs showed that they produced a purchaser who was ready, willing and able to purchase the appellants’ property on their terms. Therefore, the court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Florio, Mc-Ginity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.