Bingham v. Vertical Industrial Park Associates
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which granted the respective motions of the defendants Vertical Industrial Park Associates, Middle Village Associates, and Realty Management Associates, the third-party defendant MRF Industries, Inc., the fourth-party defendants JMR Concrete of LI Corp., Tellini Terrazzo Corp., Sharp Steel Fabricators, Inc., and Star Storefront, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, third-party complaints, fourth-party complaints and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them and substituting therefor a provision denying those motions; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
In December of 1989, while shopping with her mother and sister in the Metro Mall in Middle Village, Queens, the plaintiff allegedly fell while she was descending an interior staircase. She thereafter commenced suit against the defendants herein, Vertical Industrial Park Associates, Middle Village Associates, and Realty Management Associates, the owner and operators of the mall, alleging negligence in the design, construction, and/or maintenance of the staircase. The defendants thereafter commenced third-party actions against MRF Industries, Inc. (hereinafter MRF), the contractor who was performing work on the staircase, and Sears Roebuck and Co. (hereinafter Sears), the owner of a store adjacent to the staircase. MRF commenced a fourth-party suit against, JMR Concrete of LI Corp. (hereinafter JMR), Tellini Terrazzo Corp. (hereinafter Tellini), Sharp Steel Fabricators, Inc. (hereinafter Sharp), and Star Storefront, Inc. (hereinafter Star), other contractors that performed work at the Metro Mall. At examinations before trial, it was revealed that the plaintiff was unsure of what had caused her alleged fall, although she asserted that the staircase was "shaky” and that a piece of cement was "sticking out” on a platform on the stairs. Accordingly, the defendants MRF, Sears, JMR, Tellini, Sharp, and Star each moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaints and cross claims insofar as asserted against them. The court granted all the motions. We now modify.
In opposition to the various motions for summary judgment,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.