People ex rel. Childs v. Bennett
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Where, as here, the issues relator raises could have been raised in an administrative appeal and relator has not demonstrated that he has exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to them, habeas corpus relief is not available (see, People ex rel. Hacker v New York State Div. of Parole, 228 AD2d 849, lv denied 88 NY2d 809; People ex rel. McDaniel v Herbert, 225 AD2d 1095). Moreover, we conclude that, in the circumstances of this case, the court properly determined that relator may not rely on his lack of a transcript to avoid the requirement that he exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief. Lastly, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to assign counsel to represent relator in this habeas corpus proceeding inasmuch as the record does not indicate that relator requested that counsel be assigned to him (see, People ex rel. Williams v La Vallee, 19 NY2d 238). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.