Stalker v. Rand
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court’s finding that Nathan Rand was not properly nominated by the members of the County Committee as required by Election Law § 6-116. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly directed that the appellant’s name be removed from the ballot.
The remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.