Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996

Ali v. Schulman

Ali v. Schulman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1996
233 A.D.2d 439; 650 N.Y.S.2d 606; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12037
Ali v. Schulman

Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent District Attorney of Queens County from prosecuting the defendant under Queens County Indictment No. 11840/95.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a *440court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.