People v. Nolley
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and
The court erred in denying defendant’s request for a hearing on the constitutionality of the predicate conviction, which defendant explicitly challenged on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel (see, CPL 400.21 [3], [5], [7] [b]). In the context of a second felony offender determination, "[it] has been held that a defendant is entitled to a hearing to explore the issue of ineffective legal representation when he attacks his conviction as unconstitutional on that basis” (People v Case, 173 AD2d 892, 895, citing People v Longboat, 154 AD2d 916; and People v Allen, 135 AD2d 1034; see also, People v Wright, 119 AD2d 973, 974, lv denied 67 NY2d 1058; People v James, 109 AD2d 1095). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed on the two counts of forgery in the second degree, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing on those counts.
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sprague, J.—Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Wesley and Balio, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.