People v. Ramos
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.