People v. Henderson
Opinion of the Court
Judgment,
The court properly exercised its discretion in replacing a sworn juror who called in sick on the Friday before a three day weekend. The record made by the court established that the complainant, who was in poor health and lived in Pennsylvania, had made a difficult journey to New York to testify on the Friday in question, and would have been required to make another such journey to testify on the following Tuesday, even if the sick juror had returned by that day. Thus, the court properly considered the complainant’s availability (People v Page, 72 NY2d 69, 73; People v Williams, 222 AD2d 1122, lv denied 87 NY2d 1027), as distinguished from his mere convenience (see, People v Brown, 175 AD2d 708, lv denied 78 NY2d 1074). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.