People v. Brown
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme
Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied after a hearing which followed the Court of Appeals remittitur (86 NY2d 728). The record establishes that the police did not make any suggestive use of the jacket and hat in question, and that the presence of the victim’s sister had no effect on the victim’s identifications of defendant. The showups were otherwise permissible (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541). Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.