O'Connell v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
—Determina
Substantial evidence, including the testimony of the store manager who apprehended petitioner outside the store that petitioner had left without having paid for the lawn mower in his possession, as well as petitioner’s own written, lawyer-drafted statement admitting that he "did in fact have said lawn mower outside of the * * * store without permission or authority to do so”, supports respondent’s finding that petitioner was guilty of attempting to steal the lawn mower. The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Alfieri v Murphy, 38 NY2d 976). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.