People v. Hill
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). In addition, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.