People v. Brown
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no merit in the contention that the victim’s in-court identification of the defendant should be suppressed. Although the showup identification was overly suggestive, the victim identified the defendant in court based on a sufficiently established independent source (see, People v Ballot, 20 NY2d 600).
Contrary to the defendant’s further contention, his prior plea of guilty to attempted robbery in the second degree was a constitutionally obtained predicate conviction and, hence, it served as a proper basis upon which to sentence him as a persistent violent felony offender (see, People v Moore, 71 NY2d 1002).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.