Video-Cinema Films, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tejeda v. 750 Gerard Properties Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Video-Cinema Films, Inc. v. Migdal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- VSP Associates v. 46 Estates Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered December 7, 1995, insofar as appealed from, dismissing the complaint as against defendants-respondents, and bringing up for review an order which granted defendants-respondents’ motions for summary judgment based on plaintiffs failure to comply with a conditional preclusion order, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiffs consistent failure to comply with outstanding orders, especially his failure to comply with a conditional preclusion order from which an appeal was never perfected, warrants the drastic relief of dismissal in the absence of a reasonable excuse for the failure to comply (see, Becerril v Skate
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.