People v. Hightower
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. McCall (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Pardner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. McTootle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered April 19, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 22 years to life and 20 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant’s request for a temporary lawful possession charge, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence supporting such charge (People v Banks, 76 NY2d 799, 801; People v Snyder, 73 NY2d 900; People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043).
Since defendant had made a statement to the police consisting, under the circumstances, of an admission of guilt, he was properly cross-examined concerning that statement’s omission of the exculpatory material defendant presented in his testimony (People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673, cert denied 449 US 1016; People v Spinelli, 214 AD2d 135, 141-142). We further conclude that defendant’s cross-examination of the arresting officer concerning defendant’s postarrest statement and subsequent silence opened the door to redirect examination on the same subject.
The court’s Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.