People v. Conologue
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. The question is whether, viewed in the totality of the circumstances, the defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see, People v Ellis, 81 NY2d 854). Ineffective assistance of counsel may not be premised solely upon unsuccessful trial strategy by defense counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). We find that defense counsel provided meaningful representation.
The defendants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.