Badillo v. International Business Machines Corp.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hartman v. International Business Machines Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Liverpool v. Xerox Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action sounding in negligence and strict liability to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs Bonnie Riegler and Michael Riegler appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), entered January 12, 1996, which granted the separate motions of the defendants to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted by them as time-barred.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court correctly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted by the appellants as time-barred, since the injured appellant’s symptoms of repetitive stress injury occurred more than three years previous to the commencement of this action (see, CPLR 214 [5]; Hayes v International Bus. Machs. Corp., 237 AD2d 254]). Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.