Tillman v. J. DeBenedictis & Sons Building Corp.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, (1) as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), dated November 9, 1995, as, upon reargument, adhered to the determination in a decision dated July 19, 1995, which determined the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) from an order of the same court entered October 23, 1996, upon the decision, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the decision is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order entered October 23, 1996 (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated November 9, 1995, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order made upon reargument of a decision (see, Stockfield v Stockfield, 131 AD2d 834); and it is further,
Ordered that the order entered October 23, 1996, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.
It is well settled that " 'a party in possession or control of real property may be held liable for a hazardous condition ere
The plaintiff’s contention that a question of fact exists as to whether the snow/ice removal technique employed by the defendant exacerbated the natural hazard created by the storm is without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.