Citibank, N. A. v. Freund
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Richardson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Diaz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Staton v. Omwukeme (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Avco Mortgage Co. v. Ward (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Gita Freund and Ernest Freund appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated August 30, 1995, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to confirm so much of a Referee’s report as determined that service of process upon the defendant Gita Freund had been proper.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Matters of credibility are best determined by the hearing court, which had the opportunity to observe the witnesses (see, Fosella Bldrs. & Gen. Contrs. v Silver, 208 AD2d 525, 526). We are satisfied that the hearing court’s findings of fact support its determination that process was properly served on the defendant Gita Freund. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.