In re the Claim of Hanrahan
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Boone (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- In re the Claim of Radwan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- In re the Claim of Callahan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- In re the Claim of Dybowski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 7, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment due to marriage.
Claimant was employed by the State Department of Taxation and Finance as a sales tax auditor. The record discloses that in November 1992, claimant married a man knowing that his job required him to move to Pennsylvania. After selling her house in March 1993, claimant resigned from her employment and moved to Pennsylvania to reside with her spouse. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment due to marriage. We affirm. Labor Law § 593 (1) (a) provides that a claimant who leaves employment because of marriage has resigned under disqualifying circumstances (see, Matter of Maloney [Eastman Kodak Co.—Hudacs], 195 AD2d 746; Matter of Gaus [Hartnett], 167 AD2d 736). In our view, substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination in this case.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.