State v. Quartararo
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Harris, J.), entered April 22, 1996 in Albany County, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered against him.
Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment. As an excuse, defendant offered his miscalculation of the days in which to serve an answer. Defendant’s contriteness, however, is an insufficient basis to grant a motion to vacate (see, Beetz v City of New York, 73 AD2d 925, 926). Additionally, defendant brought no facts to the court’s attention to demonstrate that he had a meritorious defense to the claim. Accordingly, the order should be affirmed (see, Dimitratos v City of New York, 180 AD2d 414).
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.