Lathan v. NCAS Realty Management Corp.
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kormusis v. Jeffrey Gardens Apartment Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Overton v. Leisure Time Recreation, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Schirripa v. Waldbaums Supermarket (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Becker v. Cortlandt Colonial Restaurant, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Lee v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Beyda v. Helmsley Enterprises, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Brandefine v. National Cleaning Contractor, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Guarino v. La Shellda Maintenance Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- DeChirico v. Church of St. Clare (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants NCAS Realty Management Corp., Nor-wood A. Campbell, Alex Shapiro, George Bookis, Pierpointe on the Hudson Condominium I, and Board of Managers of Pierpointe on the Hudson Condominium I appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), dated May 3, 1996, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.'
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The plaintiff alleged that she slipped and fell on the lobby floor on the appellants’ premises, causing her to sustain personal injuries, as a result of the appellants’ negligence in creating a dangerous condition. In her affidavit submitted in
The plaintiff has failed to present any evidence demonstrating that the appellants were negligent in their application of wax or polish to the floor or that they otherwise created a hazardous condition. Additionally, the record does not reveal any triable issue of fact as to the required element of notice, either actual or constructive. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.