Shaikh v. Getty Petroleum Corp.
Opinion of the Court
In consolidated ac
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 18, 1996, is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated June 27, 1996, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the order dated June 18, 1996, must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an order issued ex parte (see, CPLR 5701). Further, contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the order concerning the rental arrears and future rent was proper.
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Joy, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.