Gryl v. Pulatani

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), entered August 7, 1996, which, after a hearing, inter alia, denied his motion to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The testimony elicited from the process server established by a preponderance of evidence that jurisdiction over the defendant had been obtained (see, Frankel v Schilling, 149 AD2d 657). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.