In re the Claim of Inman
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Cameron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- In re the Claim Du Bois (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- In re the Claim of Mack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- In re the Claim of Cooper (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Obafemi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 21, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was terminated from her employment as a waitress at a family restaurant as a result of customer complaints regarding her rude attitude and use of profane language. Claimant acknowledged that prior to this incident she had been warned about her inappropriate behavior and attitude toward customers. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant was terminated due to misconduct and we find no reason to disturb it (see, Matter of MacGilfrey [Sweeney], 223 AD2d 894; Matter of Schneider [Garden City Union Free School Dist.—Hudacs], 201 AD2d 811). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.