In re the Claim of Ganim
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Silberman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- In re the Claim of Sherman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- In re the Claim of Jing Ying Zeng (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Palmer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- In re the Claim of Wronski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 30, 1996, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant resigned from her position as an associate attorney after the employer refused to excuse her from night-court duty, an assignment that conflicted with a business school course in which she was enrolled. Substantial evidence supports the ruling that claimant left her employment under disqualifying circumstances. Resignation from a job because it conflicts with school has been characterized as leaving employment for personal and noncompelling reasons (see, Matter of Weremblewski [Hudacs], 193 AD2d 1030, 1031).
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.