Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997

People v. Sharpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 3, 1997

241 A.D.2d 977; 661 N.Y.S.2d 390; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7956

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Pitsley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
People v. Childs (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: This matter was remitted to Oneida County Court for a reconstruction hearing and findings of fact and a determination whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing (People v Sharpe, 225 AD2d 1075). Al*978though the issue whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing was disputed at the reconstruction hearing, the hearing court, which saw and heard the witnesses, found that defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing and that no additional hearing took place thereafter. There was ample testimony adduced at the hearing to support the court’s finding, and we will not disturb it (see, People v Michalek, 218 AD2d 750, 751, lv denied 86 NY2d 874).

We have considered the additional arguments raised in defendant’s original brief and conclude that they do not require reversal. (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Attempted Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.