Yu v. Chen
Opinion of the Court
In a
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The record reflects that the instant judgment was based upon a valid stipulation by the parties that Ethel Chen’s designating petition contained less than the required number of signatures for placement on the ballot. No appeal lies from such a judgment (see, Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 66 NY2d 677; Kalra v Kalra, 170 AD2d 579; Matter of Colletti v Colletti, 56 AD2d 845).
In any event, there is no merit to the substantive arguments made by Chen. Mangano, P. J., Pizzuto, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.