In re the Claim of Levin
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Hughes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Hammer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- In re the Claim of De Salvo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- In re the Claim of Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 13, 1996, which, inter alia, reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that Labor Law § 600 (7) required a reduction in claimant’s benefit rate reflecting his receipt of payments from an employer-funded pension fund. Claimant also was charged with a recoverable overpayment. We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the finding that claimant’s pension fund was 100% funded by the employer, thereby triggering the statutory reduction in benefit payments (see, Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 803).
Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.