Beyers v. Thrane
Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law art 3-A), the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered November 19, 1996, which denied his objections to an order of the same
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the father’s contention, the hearing was in substantial compliance with the directives of Domestic Relations Law § 37 (see, Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton, 195 AD2d 455; Matter of Williams v Williams, 133 AD2d 876).
The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Santucei and Lerner, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.