People v. DaCosta
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court conducted a proper inquiry as to defense counsel’s claimed conflict of interest (see, People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307, 314; People v Hunt, 227 AD2d 568).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and Lerner, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.