Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997

In re the Claim of Jowers

In re the Claim of Jowers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 638; 657 N.Y.S.2d 122; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4535
In re the Claim of Jowers

Opinion

In April 1995, claimant, a youth aide in a security facility, was placed on administrative leave pending an investigation regarding contraband which was given to an inmate at the security facility. Following an investigation, claimant was discharged from his employment in September 1995 but remained on the employer’s payroll and received regular paychecks until October 24, 1995 when his accrued sick, personal and vacation days were exhausted. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was not totally unemployed during the period in which he remained on the employer’s payroll and denied him unemployment insurance benefits during that period. We agree. Because an employer-employee relationship continues until accrued leave credits are exhausted, a claimant is not totally unemployed during such period (see, Matter of Berger [Ross], 41 NY2d 1065, 1066; Matter of Fuchs [Hartnett], 177 AD2d 769). As it is *639undisputed that claimant was receiving a paycheck until October 24, 1995 pursuant to his accrued leave credits, we find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is, accordingly, affirmed. To the extent that claimant contests his termination due to misconduct, such issue was not the subject of the hearing and, therefore, cannot be raised on this appeal.

Cardona, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.