Fiore v. Andrews
Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondent Commissioner of the Department of Business Services dated May 13, 1997, which
Substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that petitioner’s attack upon two uniformed market inspectors established his lack of the good character, honesty and integrity required to serve as an employee or agent of a seafood wholesaler (Administrative Code of City of NY § 22-216 [b], [c]). Respondent’s findings crediting the inspectors’ version of the melee will not be disturbed by the courts (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The 180-day suspension does not shock our sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.