People v. Murray
People v. Murray
247 A.D.2d 292; 668 N.Y.S.2d 457; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1536
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Su
The court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was proper. Defendant did not dispute the People’s contention that defendant and the victim had a relationship prior to the incident so as to render a hearing unnecessary (People v De Jesus, 244 AD2d 244; People v Estrada, 241 AJD2d 378, lv denied 90 NY2d 1011).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.