People v. English
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We agree with the defendant that the prosecutor was improperly permitted, over objection, to elicit rebuttal testimony that the defendant was in the company of an alleged co-perpetrator at the time of his arrest 12 days after the crime (see, People v Harris, 57 NY2d 335, cert denied 460 US 1047; People v Ramos, 139 AD2d 775). However, the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Mathure, 111 AD2d 876; People v Alston, 158 AD2d 607).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.