Town of Mentz v. County of Cayuga
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment
Initially, we note that the contention of petitioner that the court erred in dismissing its petition because respondents failed to file a certified transcript of the legislative proceedings is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not properly before us (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985). In any event, that contention lacks merit in view of the nature of the challenge to the resolution.
It is well settled that “the courts as a coequal branch of government may not generally set aside legislative acts unless such acts are illegal, in excess of any reasonable power conferred upon the Legislature, against public policy or unconstitutional” (Matter of Stetter v Town Bd., 46 AD2d 1006). “A well established principle binding on the courts ‘forbids interference by the latter with the action of legislative bodies, or the exercise of their discretion in matters within the range of their constitutional powers’ ” (Matter of Bartlett v Morgan, 42 AD2d 435, 437, quoting Matter of Joint Legislative Commn. to Investigate State Educ. Sys. [Teachers Union], 285 NY 1, 8). Thus, the courts will not inquire into the wisdom, reasons or motives for legislation nor interfere with the actions of such legislative bodies “ ‘absent fraud, corruption or oppression’ ” (Matter of Kent v Town of Niskayuna, 244 AD2d 829, 830, quoting Matter of Stetter v Town Bd., supra, at 1006-1007). Because the Cayuga County Legislature acted within its authority and there is no evidence or claim of fraud, corruption or oppression, the court properly dismissed the petition. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.— CPLR art 78.)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.