Tirella v. Tirella
Opinion of the Court
—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated June 28, 1996, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered March 10, 1997, as granted the defendant credit against his child support obligation for payments made by the Social Security Administration on behalf of the children of the marriage.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing to determine the intention of the parties with regard to that portion of the stipulation dated November 26, 1996, concerning payments made by the Social Security Administration on behalf of the parties’ children, and whether those payments are to be credited against the defendant’s child support obligation.
On November 26, 1996, the parties stipulated in open court
Where the terms of a stipulation are ambiguous, the court may consider extrinsic evidence as to the intent of the parties (see, Derasmo v Derasmo, 190 AD2d 655; Ackerberg v Ackerberg, 154 AD2d 414). Accordingly, a hearing is required to determine the intention of the parties on the issue of whether the defendant may take a credit in his child support payments to reflect the Social Security disability payments received on behalf of the parties’ children. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.