People v. Rosa
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The imposition of consecutive sentences was proper since the acts of attempting to rob the four complainants in this case were separate and distinct, although they occurred within a single transaction (see, People v Truesdell, 70 NY2d 809, 811; People v Humphrey, 244 AD2d 502; People v White, 192 AD2d 736). Moreover, the sentences imposed are not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.