Fishbein v. Booth Memorial Hospital
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to re
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendants’ respective cross motions to dismiss the complaint and in permitting the plaintiff to restore the case to the trial calendar (see, Michael I. Wintraub, P. C. v Computer Rad, 209 AD2d 405; Fiorello v South Shore Dental Assocs., 203 AD2d 323).
The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.