Kassner v. Poland Spring Water Co.
Opinion of the Court
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 19, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
In a prior order, from which the parties did not appeal, the Supreme Court determined that this action is governed by the substantive law of Maine.
In support of its present motion for summary judgment the defendant made out a prima facie case that this action is governed by Maine’s recreational use statute (14 Me Rev Stat Annot § 159-A) and, as owner of the abandoned bottling plant to which the plaintiffs gained access, it did not owe a duty to the injured plaintiff to keep the premises safe for entry or use or to give warning of any hazardous condition on the premises.
In opposition to the motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs asserted that 14 Maine Revised Statutes Annotated § 159-A (4) (A) applies to the facts of this case. That subsection
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.